Skip to main content

Better fit.
Earlier decisions.

Find fit risks in your 3D assembly with StackUp 3D. Explore clearances, interference and tolerance choices in desktop software built for mechanical engineers.

Mouse / XY section / Two wheel-to-housing gaps

+0.375 → −0.049 mm
+0.475 → +0.051 mm
Nominal → tolerance-adjusted gap
Illustrative 0.300 mm input per surface
80%

target reduction in
tolerance-analysis time

What could that give your team?

Tolerance analysis tools haven’t kept pace with modern engineering.

We’ve spoken to hundreds of engineering teams about tolerance analysis. Here’s what we learned.

  • Engineers dread it.

    Hours of tedious setup for routine answers.

  • Different experts. Different answers.

    Spreadsheet stackups depend on who builds them.

  • No time? No analysis.

    Deadlines hit. Checks get skipped.

  • With spreadsheets: Weeks spent setting up and running studies

    With StackUp 3D: 80% less analysis timeOur time-reduction target

  • With spreadsheets: Engineering hours lost to brittle spreadsheet workflows

    With StackUp 3D: Lower analysis costsPut engineering time into design decisions

  • With spreadsheets: Fit problems found after design freeze

    With StackUp 3D: Get ahead of reworkFind fit risks while changes are practical

  • With spreadsheets: Late changes that push back launch

    With StackUp 3D: Protect the launch scheduleResolve fit questions before committing to tooling

The 80% reduction is a target. Measure the savings on your own assemblies.

Estimate your savings

StackUp 3D is an AI-friendly approach to tolerance analysis that protects your need for engineering certainty.

Deterministic foundations.

Geometry and math drive the calculations. The same study inputs produce the same results.

Data-friendly workflows.

Work with assembly geometry, tolerance inputs and measured results your team can inspect, compare and build on.

See the gap.
Understand the choice.

Explore three fit questions, then inspect the inputs and results.

Scroll through the story

Illustrative distance field; part positions stay nominal.

Will the wheel clear the housing?

A gap in nominal CAD can disappear with variation. Zoom into the wheel-to-housing interface to see the assumed tolerances consume the clearance.

Find the interface that needs attention.

Illustrative distance field; part positions stay nominal.

Inspect the study

What controls the washer clearance?

The washer spans an adapter and a sprocket. Compare their tolerance envelopes to see how locating inputs affect the local gap.

Identify the locating control to investigate.

Illustrative rigid-pose comparison.

Inspect the study

Crossmember → support connectionFollow the locator change

Which locator should change?

Tightening the center-locator input changes the minimum gap from −0.400 mm to +0.100 mm in this one-axis study.

Bring a specific tolerance change to the design review.

Illustrative bounds for one connection and one axis.

Inspect the study

See what changed at each interface.

Inspect the studies

What changed.
What it means.

Compare the inputs, results and measurement locations.

Showing mouse study evidence.

How much gap does variation consume?

Change the surface input on both parts while keeping their positions fixed.

Mouse input and result comparison. All values in millimetres.
All values in mmInitialRevised
Surface tolerance input, each part0.0000.300
RSS-adjusted gap at the selected witness+0.375−0.049

Nominal gap at the selected witness: 0.375 mm.

StackUp 3D application capture. Assembled wheel and housing. App point measurements and rendered field use separate inputs.

Focus on the wheel-to-housing gap.

The assumed variation consumes the local gap. Check the locating relationships before setting production tolerances.

Mouse / Actual application capture

Mouse wheel and housing shown as opaque CAD in StackUp 3D

Assembled wheel and housing. App point measurements and rendered field use separate inputs.

What you can learn from StackUp 3D.

Will the parts clear?

Measure gaps between selected parts in the assembly.

Where could they clash?

See where tolerance variation can cause interference.

Which tolerance matters?

Compare inputs to focus the next design change.

What could 80%
less TA time
give your team?

Start with the early-design analyses you already perform. Estimate the engineering time you could release and the value of that capacity for your team.

Some checks never get done.

If time constraints prevent analysis today, bring those missed checks into the evaluation. Their value is in the design decisions they inform; it is not counted as savings from work you never performed.

Enter the portion of your current annual TA workload you would use StackUp 3D for.

Target reduction in time spent on TA80%

Engineering hours released / year

800 hours
$80,000Annual capacity value · USD
200 hoursRemaining annual analysis time
Illustrative workload modeled at the 80% target. Capacity value = hours released × loaded hourly cost. It becomes cash savings only if expenditure falls. Validate the applicable workflow and effort during your evaluation. Currency selection sets the denomination; it does not convert amounts.Build my TA business case
No email needed to calculate.

Your assembly.
Your fit questions.

Plan your evaluation ↗
What do we need to start?

A STEP assembly, a fit question and tolerance inputs to explore. You can investigate while the design is still evolving.

Does it replace final tolerance verification?

StackUp 3D supports early design decisions. Detailed GD&T and release-stage verification remain part of your engineering process.

How are the results calculated?

Deterministic geometry and mathematical calculations. The same study inputs produce the same results, without a trained model.

How does it fit our environment?

StackUp 3D is a desktop application for STEP assemblies. Deployment, training and integration requirements are scoped with your team.

How do we evaluate and buy it?

Start with a demo and a discussion of your fit question. A hands-on evaluation on your own assembly establishes the technical scope and business value before an annual enterprise license.

See what changes
for your team.

Start with a demo. Then choose a real assembly for a hands-on evaluation, with success criteria agreed before the work begins.

  • One fit question that matters to your program
  • A baseline for the effort and time it takes today
  • A result your engineers and decision-makers can review
Use the assembly review checklist ↗

Book a demo.

Tell us about your fit question. We’ll follow up to arrange a demo.

Enable the contact form

Our contact form is provided by HubSpot and requires Marketing consent. You can enable it here, or email us without changing your preferences.

Email info@metafold3d.com